In order to understand epistemology deeper, we
anticipate two activities in the class. Read an article and answer two
questions. One is done by individual and the other is done by group with Google
Docs.
The
answers to both questions in two activities are following:
Activity
One:
A
Social Cloud is a resource and service sharing framework utilizing
relationships established between members of a social network.
2. What
are the possible applications of a Social Cloud?
Ø A Social
Computation Cloud
Ø A Social Storage
Cloud
Ø A Social
Collaborative Cloud
Ø A Social Cloud
for Public Science
Ø An Enterprise
Social Cloud
Activity
Two:
1.
What is the definition of Social Cloud?
A
Social Cloud is a resource and service sharing framework utilizing relationships
established between members of a social network.
More comment: Social Cloud can provide some
kinds of services and these services are actually provided and maintained by a
social network instead of centralized servers. The type of the services does
not matter, it can be computational work, storage, collaborative… therefore
there are lots of applications listed in this article. As long as the services
are provided by a social network and it utilizes the relationships established
in a social network, it is considered as a Social Cloud.
2. What are the possible
applications of a Social Cloud?
Ø A Social
Computation Cloud
Ø A Social
Storage Cloud
Ø A Social
Collaborative Cloud
Ø A Social
Cloud for Public Science
Ø An
Enterprise Social Cloud
More reading:
Social Cloud: Cloud Computing in Social Networks
Social Cloud: Cloud Computing in Social Networks
Both
activities are process of knowledge formation.
Epistemic
aims are goals related to finding things out, understanding them and forming
beliefs. But, in different
conditions, such as individual work and group work, is there any change in
epistemic aim? As for me, there is a
little change. In the individual work, my aim is to acquire true definition
of social cloud and understand it and its application. On the another hand, in
the group work, I expect to know more different opinions about the
understanding of the social cloud, maybe we can have a discussion and introduce
more sources to know it. You know, more
people mean more ideas. As Prof. Chan said, Idea diversity is essential to the development of knowledge
advancement, just as biodiversity is essential to the success of an ecosystem. Therefore,
I think in group work, it may propose new and different ideas, which is
beneficial to knowledge formation.
In the
individual work, the process of knowledge formation is based on one’s own understanding and thought of the resource. For
example, in the activity one, I understand the social cloud from reading the
article and searching other relative documents. The knowledge formation is
based on my own mode of thinking and experience. Maybe, I am not sure to
clearly understand the social cloud for public science, one of the possible
applications of a social cloud, because of the limitation of my knowledge.
In
fact, group work is a kind of socialize
learning, which is to build knowledge together in a social environment. It
is a collective process when a group of people contribute and acquire knowledge
and build new theory together. In the discussion, we can interact continuously to improve the quality, coherence and utility of
idea. From the answers above, in group work, during the discussion and
argumentation, we share each other understanding and confusion, make more and
new comments and import more resource to understand the social cloud knowledge deeper.
To sum
up, everyone needs individual work and group work to form knowledge. Undoubtedly,
self-learning ability is important, but how to make the best use of group study
is also very important, especially in rapid development information age, such
as many forums for us to know or discuss knowledge.
It is clear that you have a good opinion about individual work and group work for knowledge formation.On one hand,having self-learning ability is important,on the other hand,making the best use of group study is also valuable.
回复删除此评论已被作者删除。
回复删除How special your article is!! When I read others’, almost of them believe the group discussion is more important and only through that can we get the correct answers and new knowledge. However, only you emphasize the importance of individual. Indeed, the group discussion is on the third level which might be higher than individual understanding. But we might ignore the fact that if there are no opinions from individual first, we could not exchange ideas and find answers. Meanwhile, if there are first two levels cognition, it would be hard to improve the level to the highest cognition.
回复删除yeah~ Thank you for giving so cool comments. Group discussion is aimed to improve or complete individual's opinions or inspire some new method of thinking. But, in the nowadays, more and more peoples don't think about the problem or a new opinion firstly, but look for the answers on the website or just know what others think about. Maybe we can get a better solution from group discussion, but the more important issue is not just only for the better solution, but the way of thinking or other things.
删除sorry,I made a mistake just now.
回复删除In the last paragraph, you mentioned that we can know in forums. This may be true but in my opinion it is very important that you have the ability to distinguish which pieces of information are correct there as there are many fake news and knowledge in forums which would lead you to wrong direction of knowledge knowing.
回复删除